Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:38
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Fat composition in ketogenic diet may influence outcomes in MS - Multiple Sclerosis News Today
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
10 Best RPGs With Near Flawless Steam User Review Scores - DualShockers
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Texas, Oklahoma and Nevada make changes to lure business amid Delaware’s ‘Dexit’ concern - AP News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Long-dead satellite emits strong radio signal, puzzling astronomers - CNN
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why is there no evidence of a multiverse theory?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
9 morning habits of people who age slower than everyone else, according to psychology - VegOut
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: